All the same thing?

Martin seems to think that Canadian Values and Liberal Values are one in the same. He also thinks that what the liberal party has decided on the behalf of Canada is the same as what Canadians want. Martin makes the following statements:

"This election is fundamentally an election about two very different perspectives on Canada,"

"One, Stephen Harper's which has been imported from the extreme far right in the United States and the other and other based in Canadian values."

(kyoto accord)"Stephen Harper would renege on that commitment. He would break our word to the world on an international treaty."

"My government said no to it but Stephen Harper would open the door to Canada joining ballistic missile defence."

His first statement could not be more true... this election is about a different perspective of Canada... and that is a very different one that the liberals have been giving us for years.

The second statement is a little fuzzy... imported from the extreme right of the United States... Imported? Well not really... there are people in Canada that actually think the same way as some of those in the US. The US does not have a copyright on those types of views.... Extreme? I don't find anything Mr. Harper is saying is extreme... But then I am a concervative and I guess that some liberals might find his views extreme... but then again... I find the liberals views extreme... Are the values of the liberal party of Canada the same as Canadian values? I doubt that very much. As I pointed out in a previous post... I doubt very much that Canadian Values include corruption, theft, lies, broken promisses just to name a few of the Liberal Parties values as they have shown time and time again.

Yes Mr. Harper has stated he would back out of the kyoto accord and impliment other Canadian made solutions to the problem. Funny that Paul holds this one so close to his heart as he has failed his commitment to kyoto in every sense of the accord. The liberal party may have signed the accord on behalf of Canada but they sure have not lived up to it. The only "word" Mr. Harper would be breaking is that of the liberal party of Canada, they are the ones that signed onto this not Canadian's. Not to mention that the liberal party have already failed the people of Canada on this issue in a big way.

Yes Paul, here is where the fundimental part comes in... "your" party rams things down the peoples of Canada's throats... you decide what Canadian's want. Mr. Haper is willing to listen to Canadian's and give us a voice in what we will and will not support in Canada. Mr. Harper will open the door... that door leads to open and honest debate and free votes on the issues within parliament... unlike "your" party Paul. P.S. Paul... anyone who relates to a party as "my party" has issues and should seek help... correct me if I am wrong but is it not supposed to be representing Canada... not you? our party would be a far better way to state things...

Paul irritates me to no end... can you tell......